- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:15:30 +0100
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- CC: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>
Tim Bray wrote: > Scope: We assume that a RDDL document is XHTML with embedded > machine-readable information This is not a proposal, just a nit/question (and in the abstract at that): should XHTML be assumed or should it rather be something along the lines of "human-readable XML vocabulary"? I would tend to prefer the openness of the latter which allows for instance for SVG or XML+CSS, but maybe you have reasons to believe that XHTML is a better fit, in which case exposing them might help the definition of proposals. -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr> Research Engineer, Expway 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 09:16:32 UTC