Re: The RDDL challenge

Robin Berjon wrote:

> Tim Bray wrote:
>
> > Scope: We assume that a RDDL document is XHTML with embedded
> > machine-readable information
>
>
> This is not a proposal, just a nit/question (and in the abstract at
> that): should XHTML be assumed or should it rather be something along
> the lines of "human-readable XML vocabulary"? 

I personally prefer XHTML because I think there's real value in being 
able to type the namespace URI into any browser and something useful 
happens.  But let's not micro-manage this, make any proposal you want -Tim