W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2002

Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:27:24 -0500
Message-ID: <055401c1d0ec$e6c5da70$9601a8c0@CREST>
To: "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>, <danc@w3.org>, "'www-tag'" <www-tag@w3.org>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>
To: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>; <danc@w3.org>; "'www-tag'"
<www-tag@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: The range of the HTTP dereference function


> At 06:41 PM 3/20/02 -0500, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
> >The URI spec tells us that the significance of the URI with the hash
> >on is a function of the language of  document you get when you
> >dereference the thing before the hash.  Therefore, for an RDF document,

as that referred to

> >RDF defines what the thing *with* the hash identifies (anything)
>
> This feels to me like a confusion between the thing referenced and the
> thing doing the referencing:
>
>    RDF-doc  --references-->  something#fragment

I meant
             whatever ---references--> myRDFdoc#fradid

> As I understand the web principles, the meaning of #fragment here is not
> dependent on the (MIME) content of 'RDF-doc', but of 'something'.

Precicely, or in the way I meant, it is speendent on the RDF doc.

> #g
>
>
> -------------------
> Graham Klyne
> <GK@NineByNine.org>
>
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 10:27:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:05 GMT