Re: RFC 3205

On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Mark Baker wrote:
> Some members of the XML Protocol WG put together a detailed response[1]
> to Keith's draft.  I believe it reflects the bulk of the architectural
> differences between what Web architecture is, and what the IESG believes
> it to be.
>
> The IESG's response to our response was to dismiss it[2].
>
>  [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2000Dec/0061.html
>  [2] http://www.atm.tut.fi/list-archive/ietf-announce/msg07087.html

Did you ever send your comments to a public IETF list (e.g.
ietf@ietf.org)?  I did a brief check through the archives, and I can't
find anything.

Rob