At 02:53 PM 01/03/02 -0500, Mark Baker wrote: >> jpg vs. gif is clearly appropriate for conneg; I don't think many >> would dispute text/plain vs. text/html (in most cases). What about >> jpg vs. gif vs. SVG? ... >> I agree that there's a clear distinction between RDF Schema and XML >> Schema; I'm less sure that there is between XSD, Relax and DTD. This area is just horribly fuzzy. I'm pretty sure that for any of {RDFS, XSD, RelaxNG, DTD} you can make assertions that can't be made in the others. At least pairwise. Alternatively, you *could* write a set of schemas that tried to do the same things. But this would be unidiomatic at best... I'm not really sure we're in content-negotiation territory at all here. And as previously noted, to make things worse, it's not unusual at all to have multiple schemas in the same schema language. -TimReceived on Friday, 1 March 2002 15:11:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:05 GMT