W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2002

RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document names paces?

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 22:07:02 -0000
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F04A071A6@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'David Orchard'" <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org


Hi Dave,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com]
> Sent: 09 December 2002 21:41
> 
> Dan,
> 
> I have a very big concern that most namespace names will become used as
URIs
> to XML Schema documents.  That trend is already occuring.
> And XML Schema documents are, how shall I say it, not very human 
> understandable.  The XMLP group has provided wonderful rationale for why
required machine
> understandable references (DTDs) in a document are a bad thing.
Widespread
> adoption of XML Schemas for namespace name documents will cause the same
> problem(s).  XML Schema documents or DTDs, the logic is the same.

Hmmm.... dereferencing all of:

	http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope
	http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults
	http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-upgrade
	http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding

yield what the current SOAP WD describe as normative XML Schema [1].

> 
> Cheers,
> Dave

Cheers,

Stuart
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part1-20020626/#notation
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 17:10:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:14 GMT