W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2002

RE: "resolution mechanism"

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:14:10 -0500
Message-ID: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEEB43@HQ5>
To: "'Tim Berners-Lee'" <timbl@w3.org>, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, www-tag@w3.org
No. Treat them as a Public ID.  That means 
the local system has to be able to dereference 
them only if it needs to.  If a URN is 
just a name, then dereferencing is by 
local scope, a local choice.  Otherwise 
why would you need anything other than a 
URL?  It isn't detrimental to any architecture 
to enable local choice.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Berners-Lee [mailto:timbl@w3.org]

The problem is not a protocol to be able to resolve any URI.
The problem is to give something an identifier which can later
be resolved.  The appropriate scheme is http.

Don't use URNs.  They don't have a protocol.  If you use them,
then we will all have to make a new protocol for URNs.
We will end up reinventing HTTP which IMHO will be a
serious fragmentation of the specification and very detrimental
to the web as a whole.
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 09:14:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:06 GMT