Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL

Tim,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Garret Wilson" <garret@globalmentor.com>
To: <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: RE: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL


> > The point I keep trying to make is that the properties like
> > "nature", "purpsoe", and "description", are properties <emph>of
> > the related resource</emph>, not of the namespace or of the RDDL
> > or of the directory entry.  T
>
> Actually, that's only true for "description". The *nature*, as RDDL
defines
> it, is not a nature of the namespace but of the resource that's being
> associated with the namespace.

Sorry, I misread your statement. We were agreeing about "nature" and
"description" (although the latter could be a property of the namespace or
the related resource), but see my disagreement about "purpose" in that post.

Garret