W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2002

Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL

From: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 07:29:18 -0500
Message-ID: <00bd01c1e08b$56074ec0$d8f30cd8@odysseus2001>
To: <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
Tim,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Garret Wilson" <garret@globalmentor.com>
To: <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: RE: [namespaceDocument-8] RDF and RDDL


> > The point I keep trying to make is that the properties like
> > "nature", "purpsoe", and "description", are properties <emph>of
> > the related resource</emph>, not of the namespace or of the RDDL
> > or of the directory entry.  T
>
> Actually, that's only true for "description". The *nature*, as RDDL
defines
> it, is not a nature of the namespace but of the resource that's being
> associated with the namespace.

Sorry, I misread your statement. We were agreeing about "nature" and
"description" (although the latter could be a property of the namespace or
the related resource), but see my disagreement about "purpose" in that post.

Garret
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 08:30:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:06 GMT