W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > February 2015

Re: making comma-wsp optional between points list coordinates

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:57:16 +1100
To: Robert Longson <longsonr@gmail.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20150205215716.GG15104@wok.mcc.id.au>
Robert Longson:
> What about number-optional-number?
> 
> And viewBox numbers?
> 
> If you're going to change things it should all be consistent shouldn't it?

Yes that would be good.

I am in the middle of trying to rationalise attribute parsing throughout
the spec, and re-using the CSS parser (and using its metasyntax for
describing valid values) where possible.

For number-optional-number specifically, all uses of that have moved to
the Filters spec, and that spec is currently written against SVG 1.1.
If a second level of the Filters spec is started, we could base it on
SVG 2 and use SVG 2’s attribute parsing rules.

> There's also the arguments to transform to consider e.g. are you going to
> allow transform="rotate(7-7-23)" or matrix, translate and scale arguments.

I think that already works due to transform being a property now, and
presentation attributes being parsed with the CSS parser.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 21:57:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:39 UTC