- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:29:21 +1100
- To: "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
On 24/12/12 11:50 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote: > So I would suggest removing the "implements" statement above and > replacing it with: > > SVGMarkerElement implements SVGTests; > > Any disagreement? David Zbarsky also asks whether SVGDefinitionElement needs to exist, if it won't be a place to mix in SVGTests. We can probably do with it altogether then, and just have the definition elements inherit from SVGElement (as they do in SVg 1.1).
Received on Thursday, 27 December 2012 07:29:38 UTC