W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Emoji Unicode

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:37:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4E8830D7.7010002@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
CC: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, 'www-svg' <www-svg@w3.org>
David Dailey wrote:

> Are the colors and gradients a part of the Unicode definition, or does 
> Unicode merely encode path geometry (like WOFF)?

To a first approximation Unicode doesn't define the appearance of 
character, only its meaning.  Most font technologies can only represent 
a solid single colour, as that is what moveable type can do.

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Sunday, 2 October 2011 09:38:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:26 UTC