W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Revisiting SVG Fonts

From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 15:04:05 -0700
Message-Id: <FD371848-737D-42CB-A8EF-2CE9996F3F5E@jumis.com>
Cc: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>




On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:44 PM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2011, at 1:05 AM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
>> Would Mozilla be supportive of SVG Font development if other vendors were supportive of OpenType w/ SVG glyph tables?
>> 
>> I wouldn't. Mozilla as a whole doesn't really have positions on issues like this.
> 
> Would (functioning) patch sets supporting SVG Fonts be rejected from the Mozilla code base?
> 
> For SVG 1.2 Tiny fonts? I'm not 100% sure, but probably.

Are you implying that the bar should be set higher for inclusion, such as SVG 1.1 ?
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 22:04:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:49 GMT