W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Revisiting SVG Fonts

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:44:18 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLYrGb9C3mNGYYBAb+_SOY7srVmSUzhPhX3p1FyAfhJ7xA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Cc: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:

> On Nov 3, 2011, at 1:05 AM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Charles Pritchard < <chuck@jumis.com>
> chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>> Would Mozilla be supportive of SVG Font development if other vendors were
>> supportive of OpenType w/ SVG glyph tables?
>>
>
> I wouldn't. Mozilla as a whole doesn't really have positions on issues
> like this.
>
>
> Would (functioning) patch sets supporting SVG Fonts be rejected from the
> Mozilla code base?
>

For SVG 1.2 Tiny fonts? I'm not 100% sure, but probably.

Rob
-- 
"If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not
in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us
our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not
sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John
1:8-10]
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 21:44:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:49 GMT