- From: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:58:43 +1100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: ddailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, robert@ocallahan.org, www-svg@w3.org
Nice point, however: 1) That is a "should" in a non-normative section. 2) Refers to the attribute _value_, not whether the attribute itself should be created, therefore not what was being discussed. Thanks for the pointer, albeit to the wrong thing. I think all existing implementations maintain the base DOM value and the presentation value so that it a useful paragraph to read. Daniel's comment regarding the thought experiment is more relevant, although it points to the quickly thought example maybe not being thorough enough. I'm sure others will find time to debate this one. The issue relates to _adding_ an attribute to the DOM, and I don't see any spec. regarding that. Pointers would be appreciated. Alex --Original Message--: >* Alex Danilo wrote: >>Nothing in the spec. says animations shouldn't change the DOM either. > >"When an animation is running, it should not actually change >the attribute values in the DOM." -- SMIL 2.1, section 3.3.1. >-- >Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de >Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de >25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ > > >
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 00:59:21 UTC