- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:28:49 +1300
- To: Nikolas Zimmermann <zimmermann@physik.rwth-aachen.de>
- Cc: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>, Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>, www-svg@w3.org
Alex Danilo: > > The animateMotion should be applied to the parent element which in > > that case is the <svg>. Since that's a container element all the > > content should have the animateMotion applied. So the example is OK. Nikolas Zimmermann: > Hehe, now that was stupid, I should have had my coffee before > mailing :-) > But I'm still questioning wheter it's valid as SVGSVGElement is not > SVGTransformable, but only SVGLocatable. > So shall it be possible to apply transforms to SVG using SMIL > animations, but not through <svg transform=".." The spec does state in http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/animate.html#AnimationAttributesAndProperties that <svg> is a valid target of <animateMotion>. Whether it makes sense for <svg> elements not to be transformable is something I’ve wondered for a while. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 08:29:39 UTC