- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:43:27 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: www-style@w3.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, 2:45:14 PM, fantasai wrote: f> Chris Lilley wrote: >> We would prefer that the clarification, which is a minor wording change >> which improves the clarity, still be added. f> I've added "(excluding the delimiting braces)" to the paragraph here: f> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-style-attr/#syntax f> Let me know if this addresses your comment. Thank you, that addresses the comment. >> Scientific notation is NOT allowed. >> I have been asked by the SVG WG to ask the CSS WG, once again, to allow >> scientific notation for those properties which allow it. In SVG, currently >> those properties allow scientific notation in presentation attributes but >> dissallow it in style sheets (style attributes, style elements, external >> style sheets). This disparity causes user confusion. f> This issue is out of scope for the Styling Attributes specification. Yes, I understand that it is an issue of the Core CSS Grammar, not specific to this particular spec. Nevertheless, it came up in SVG WG discussion and I was asked to (once again) ask for this, so I did. f> (Also, the CSSWG has already resolved not to make this change.) Probably best to use a separate thread for that issue, then. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 2010 08:25:39 UTC