W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Margins for filters?

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:18:50 +1200
Message-ID: <s2i11e306601004190018z502d0734ue59ef03c85609341@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de>
Cc: Jasper van de Gronde <th.v.d.gronde@hccnet.nl>, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>, www-svg@w3.org
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de> wrote:

> Ah yes, sorry. This makes sense. I agree with you on subregions: Should
> be possible to define a clipping area, if no area is defined make the
> area infinite. And I also agree not to clip to the filter effect region
> during the calculation process of effects, even if our current
> implementation in WebKit follow SVG 1.1 in all points here.
> But I still think we should be consistent to pattern and masker. Both
> clip to their boundaries. While we could change this on masking (take
> your proposal here as well), we shouldn't do it on pattern. On pattern
> the area defines a tile that is used for the pattern.
>

Yes. For that reason, I think it's OK for patterns to be treated differently
from masks and filters. Patterns are also conceptually different, because
they're paint servers and filters and masks are not.

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 07:19:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:44 GMT