Re: External References for <use>

Doug Schepers wrote:

>> I suspect it was a low priority for Adobe, because their primary market
>> was marketing, for which looking like the competition is anathema.
> 
> I'm not sure what this means.  What competition of Adobe allowed 
> distributed symbol and resource libraries?
> 

Competition for Adobe's customers, not for Adobe.  I think the 
particular advantage that Jonathon was looking for was having a library 
shared across all users of the icons, not just sharing within a 
particular brand.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.

Received on Sunday, 2 August 2009 19:57:11 UTC