W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: in consist

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:21:57 +1000
To: 向雅 <fyaoxy@gmail.com>, www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090407072157.GB11210@arc.mcc.id.au>
Cameron McCormack:
> Yes, that seems to be a contradiction.  The SVG 1.1 DTD allows
> <font-face> only as a child of <font>.  The SVG 1.0 DTD, however, allows
> <font-face> as a child of container elements (such as <g>) too.

I’m half wrong: those two sentences aren’t a contradiction.  It says
that every <font> element must have a <font-face> child, but it doesn’t
say that every <font-face> must be a child of a <font>.

The SVG 1.1 DTD is inconsistent with the text of the chapter, though,
since it allows a <font-face> only as a child of <font>.

Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 07:22:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:17 UTC