- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:17:41 +1000
- To: 向雅 <fyaoxy@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
向雅: > 1.1 spec: 20.3 last line: > > Each 'font' element must have a 'font-face' child element which > describes various characteristics of the font. > > 20.4 The 'glyph' element > > and spec 20.8.3 The 'font-face' element > > The 'font-face' element corresponds directly to the @font-face > facility in CSS2. It can be used to describe the characteristics of > any font, SVG font or otherwise. > > When used to describe the characteristics of an SVG font contained > within the same document, it is recommended that the 'font-face' > element be a child of the 'font' element it is describing so that the > 'font' element can be self-contained and fully-described. > > Issue: > the line 20.8.3 use "recommended" word but the former use word "must". > > is a issue? Yes, that seems to be a contradiction. The SVG 1.1 DTD allows <font-face> only as a child of <font>. The SVG 1.0 DTD, however, allows <font-face> as a child of container elements (such as <g>) too. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 07:18:49 UTC