W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: in consist

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:17:41 +1000
To: 向雅 <fyaoxy@gmail.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090407071740.GA11210@arc.mcc.id.au>
向雅:
> 1.1 spec: 20.3 last line:
> 
> Each 'font' element must have a 'font-face' child element which
> describes various characteristics of the font.
> 
> 20.4 The 'glyph' element
> 
> and spec 20.8.3 The 'font-face' element
> 
> The 'font-face' element corresponds directly to the @font-face
> facility in CSS2. It can be used to describe the characteristics of
> any font, SVG font or otherwise.
> 
> When used to describe the characteristics of an SVG font contained
> within the same document, it is recommended that the 'font-face'
> element be a child of the 'font' element it is describing so that the
> 'font' element can be self-contained and fully-described.
> 
> Issue:
> the line 20.8.3 use "recommended" word but the former use word "must".
> 
> is a issue?

Yes, that seems to be a contradiction.  The SVG 1.1 DTD allows
<font-face> only as a child of <font>.  The SVG 1.0 DTD, however, allows
<font-face> as a child of container elements (such as <g>) too.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 07:18:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:42 GMT