W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: [1.2T LC] font-variant in SVGT1.2 and SVG1.1 (ACTION-2286)

From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:40:15 +0200
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200810101840.15313.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>

Erik Dahlstrom:
> Dr Hoffmann wrote:
> > in '10.9 Font selection properties' of SVGT1.2font-variant is indicated
> > to be not animatable,
> > in '10.10 Font selection properties' of SVG1.1
> > it is indicated to be animatable.
> > Is this a specific restriction for the tiny profile
> > or why was this change/ backwards inconsistencyintroduced? Or are there
> > specific problems with the
> > animation of font-variant for mobile phones?
>
> The RelaxNG schema and the attribute appendix was in conflict with the
> definition of the 'font-variant' property in the text chapter, for whether
> it was animatable or not. The group sees no reason for this being
> restricted for mobile user agents, and since it's in conflict with other
> parts of the spec as well as with SVG 1.1 this has now been fixed (see the
> font-variant property[1]).
>
> Thank you for your review, please let us know if this resolution is
> satisfactory.
> /Erik
>
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/text.html#FontVariantProperty

Yes, of course this solves the problem and good to know, that there are
no specific problems with mobile phones with such an animation ...
Received on Friday, 10 October 2008 16:47:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:40 GMT