W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: [1.2T LC] font-variant in SVGT1.2 and SVG1.1 (ACTION-2286)

From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:07:27 +0200
To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uis2ipm7geuyw5@macbooked.local>

Dr Hoffmann wrote:

> in '10.9 Font selection properties' of SVGT1.2font-variant is indicated  
> to be not animatable,
> in '10.10 Font selection properties' of SVG1.1
> it is indicated to be animatable.
> Is this a specific restriction for the tiny profile
> or why was this change/ backwards inconsistencyintroduced? Or are there  
> specific problems with the
> animation of font-variant for mobile phones?

The RelaxNG schema and the attribute appendix was in conflict with the  
definition of the 'font-variant' property in the text chapter, for whether  
it was animatable or not. The group sees no reason for this being  
restricted for mobile user agents, and since it's in conflict with other  
parts of the spec as well as with SVG 1.1 this has now been fixed (see the  
font-variant property[1]).

Thank you for your review, please let us know if this resolution is  
satisfactory.
/Erik

[1]  
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/text.html#FontVariantProperty

-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Friday, 10 October 2008 11:08:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:40 GMT