W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Defining a pragmatic semantic description of SVG content.

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:34:19 +0000
Message-ID: <479E586B.905@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-svg List <www-svg@w3.org>

~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote:

>        Text
> 
> Text in SVG is not semantically rich as in other languages such as HTML. 
> The screenreader user may experience problems[3] understanding spoken 
> text, as it is likely to be context specific in a graphical environment 
> such as SVG.

The other thing that is likely to happen in any document not explicitly 
designed for accessibility is that the text is likely to come out in far 
from the logic reading order, even if SVG is being used as a page 
description language, rather than mainly for graphics.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 28 January 2008 22:34:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:38 GMT