W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Can i specify a rectangle within an image tag in a svg file

From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:20:18 +0100
To: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>, "Mustafizur Rahaman" <mustaf.here@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-svg List" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t1t1v4ufdhsuf5@gnorps.palace.opera.no>

Jonathan,
I think that's jumping to conclusions a bit too quickly. I just explained  
what the spec says (on svg-developers@yahoogroups.com). I represent Opera  
(the company) and I should certainly hope that Opera (the company) doesn't  
interpret the spec in a very different way than I do :)

Opera 9.5 beta (the product) handles this case in a way it shouldn't, as  
it doesn't yet follow the rules in section C.2 [1] which states that such  
elements should be ignored. This has now been logged as bug 297855, if you  
are interested to follow up on it.

Meanwhile, Opera 9.2x seems to handle this just fine.

If you wish to provide more testcases for invalid svg content (according  
to the 1.2T schema) to test how implementations handle such content I  
should think that you'd be most welcome to do so.

As far as the original question goes (I did miss addressing that part of  
it), if you wish to draw svg content such as images and rects in a  
viewport why not use the <animation> element instead of the <image>  
element?

Cheers
/Erik

> On 11/15/07, "~:'' ありがとうございました。" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>  
> wrote: Mustaf,
>
> notwithstanding the good doctors response, it seems that it may be
> that Opera interprets the spec differently.
> have copied in Erik.
>
> regards
>
> Jonathan Chetwynd
> Accessibility Consultant on Media Literacy and the Internet
>
>
>
> On 15 Nov 2007, at 05:28, Mustafizur Rahaman wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering whether we can specify a rectangle inside an image
> tag in a svg file.
>
> The thought came to my mind because, we know that when we specify an
> image, it creates a new viewport, so i was wondering whether it is
> possible/legal to render any other basic shape within that image
> viewport.
>
> May be you can take a look at the attached svg file.My question is
> "the way i have specified rectangle with is rect1 , it is a valid svg
> file or not.
>
> Thanks & Regs.
> Mustaf<Image_complx_rect_Matrix.svg>

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/implnote.html#UnsupportedProps

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2007 12:18:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:38 GMT