W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: SVGT 1.2 : Animating "editable" attribute on text

From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:33:31 +0200
To: Chethana.R@nokia.com, www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tt9uh5codhsuf5@gnorps.palace.opera.no>

The multiple conflicting places seems like something the WG should discuss  
and fix.

However, the spec says in Appendix D [3]:
"In the case of a conflict between the prose of this specification and the  
RelaxNG schema, the prose is authoritative (for example, the prose  
description of some attributes has an EBNF grammar for allowed values,  
which the RelaxNG is not able to express)."

This seems to be such a case.
/Erik

[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/conform.html#Terminology

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:30:49 +0200, <Chethana.R@nokia.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> But the same chapter [2] link  
> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/text.html#editable-attribute contains
> The schema for editable attribute as
>
> Schema: editable
>
>     <define name='svg.Editable.attr' combine='interleave'>
>       <optional>
>         <attribute name='editable' svg:animatable='false'  
> svg:inheritable='false'>
>           <choice>
>   					<value>none</value>
>   					<value>simple</value>
>   				</choice>
>         </attribute>
>       </optional>
>     </define>
>
> Which states editable is not animatable.
>
> If editable is animatable it would mean the text can be edited for some  
> time and then editing is prohibited.
>
> Is this the right behaviour?
>
> Best Regards,
> Chethana R
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ext Erik Dahlström [mailto:ed@opera.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 1:38 PM
>> To: R Chethana (Nokia-TP-MSW/Bangalore); www-svg@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: SVGT 1.2 : Animating "editable" attribute on text
>>
>> Hello Chetana,
>> The attribute table appendix[1] is informative, which is
>> stated at the top of the appendix. The normative statements
>> for 'editable' are in the text chapter[2].
>>
>> So, 'editable' is animatable and the appendix is in error I believe.
>> /Erik
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/attributeTable.html
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/text.html#editable-attribute
>>
>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:56:46 +0200, <Chethana.R@nokia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> As per the latest SVGT 1.2 Spec at
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/text.html#TextElement, the
>>> description of the editable attribute reads:
>>>
>>> editable = "none" | simple"
>>> This attribute indicates whether the text can be edited. See the
>>> definition of the 'editable'
>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/text.html#editable-attribute>
>>> attribute.
>>> Animatable
>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/animate.html#Animatable> :
>>> yes.
>>>
>>>
>>> But from the Attribute Table found at
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/attributeTable.html
>>>
>>> L.2 Attribute Table
>>>
>>> Attribute	 ani.	 inh.	 Value	 Elements	
>>>
>>>
>>> editable	 ✘	 ✘	 'none' | 'simple'	 text
>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/elementTable.html#element_text> ,
>>> textArea
>>>
>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/elementTable.html#element_textArea> 	
>>>
>>>
>>> Hence there is confusion whether "editable" attribute is
>> animatable or
>>> not.
>>>
>>> Please help in resolving the same….
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Chethana R
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 12:33:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:37 GMT