W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: opacity, animate and mask

From: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:52:27 +0100
Message-Id: <49F25A23-E80D-4308-9375-460407E27DA0@btinternet.com>
Cc: SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>

David,

are you suggesting that Doug's assertion is without value?

regarding your second suggestion, pointer-events is also available,  
and could be used to meet their needs.

cheers

Jonathan Chetwynd



On 4 Aug 2007, at 12:49, David Woolley wrote:


~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote:
  Doug,
> please could you provide an example to substantiate your assertion  
> that:
> "there would be no way to achieve certain effects"

That appears to be a request to prove the negative, which is  
generally impossible.

Personally, I see no fundamental logic that dictates that your way is  
better, and I think you are failing to consider that many people  
might want to disable events before total transparency was achieved
-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 12:52:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:37 GMT