W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: opacity, animate and mask

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:49:07 +0100
Message-ID: <46B467B3.6010703@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>

~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote:
> please could you provide an example to substantiate your assertion that:
> "there would be no way to achieve certain effects"

That appears to be a request to prove the negative, which is generally 

Personally, I see no fundamental logic that dictates that your way is 
better, and I think you are failing to consider that many people might 
want to disable events before total transparency was achieved
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 11:49:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:29:34 UTC