W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2006

RE: [SVGMobile12] STZLC3-9 listening to document events

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:09:41 +0100
To: <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00f101c675bc$f2f4f8c0$7e01a8c0@Jan>

Hello all,

I also had the same requirement, but haven't yet managed to convince others,
and so get it into the new version of XML Events. :)

However, one thing that does strike me is that if we agree that observer
becomes a URI then this could just fall out by using an empty @observer
value. Is that the kind of solution others were thinking of?

Regards,

Mark


Mark Birbeck
CEO
x-port.net Ltd.

e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net
t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/
w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/

Download our XForms processor from
http://www.formsPlayer.com/



> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] 
> On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
> Sent: 12 May 2006 12:40
> To: Andrew Shellshear; www-svg@w3.org
> Cc: jcdufourd@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [SVGMobile12] STZLC3-9 listening to document events
> 
> 
> On Thu, 11 May 2006 16:03:00 +0200, Andrew Shellshear 
> <Andrew.Shellshear@research.canon.com.au> wrote:
> >> If this analysis is right, please specify a way to declare 
> a listener 
> >> element observing the document.
> >
> > We have discussed this, and think that the use cases for 
> this aren't 
> > strong enough to add anything to the spec for this version.  It is 
> > currently possible to do this using scripting.  However, this is 
> > something we would definitely consider adding to the next 
> version, and 
> > to SVG 1.2 Full.
> 
> You mean that the SVG WG will take this up with the people 
> doing XML Events 2.0?
> 
> 
> --
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 12 May 2006 12:10:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT