On Monday, March 6, 2006, 6:26:02 PM, Bjoern wrote: BH> * Chris Lilley wrote: >>Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> >> >>> Well, you tell me why SVG Tiny 1.2 does not conform to the Character >>> Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Fundamentals Recommendation and why >>> the Working Group failed to formally address my comment to change that >>> and I'll tell you... >> >>Please list the specific lack of conformance that you have in mind. BH> I would not know what to add to the clarification I've already provided BH> when asked in response to the comment So, you have a specific comment in mind. great. Pointer? BH> the Working Group still has not BH> formally addressed as far as I can tell. If I had a pointer I could see whether its been addressed. It sounds as if you do, but are unwilling to share it with us. This is rather odd. BH> Please explain in detail what BH> is unclear about the conformance requirements, my review comment, and BH> the clarification I've provided. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Monday, 6 March 2006 17:52:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:48 GMT