* Doug Schepers wrote: >The SVG WG agrees that this behavior is not what was intended, and is >inconsistent with regards to the behavior of the fragment identifier in >HTML. This is due to an omission in SVG 1.0, and we have restored the intent >of the behavior. > >The specification now indicates that when a bare name fragment identifier >indicates an existing element, that element will be centered in the >viewport. The exact wording will be available in the next public draft. If >this behavior or the specific wording does not satisfy your concern, please >respond promptly. I certainly object to the Working Group's decision to disguise this new feature as correction of an "omission" in SVG 1.0. As I pointed out in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2006Jan/0526.html the issue raised here is the result of thoughtless search and replace; what you propose is incompatible with SVG 1.1, which specified different but per- fectly sensible behavior that is at least as consistent with "HTML". -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 23:38:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:52 GMT