W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2006

Re: [SVGMobile12] SVGT12-207: SVG Tiny 1.2 does not comply to AWWW

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:40:05 -0700
Message-Id: <AE9D85C8-4697-44B9-9D9A-83063E54D2BF@apple.com>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-svg@w3.org
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>

On Jun 20, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Chris Lilley wrote:

> On Thursday, June 8, 2006, 11:41:17 PM, Ian wrote:
> IH> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Chris Lilley wrote:
>>> The WG thus believes that the statement is correct, and as one of  
>>> the
>>> authors of that specification I concur.
> IH> Please mark my disagreement clearly in your disposition of  
> comments.
> No problem. The fact that you believe that SVG Tiny 1.2 does not  
> comply with AWWW - a specification that explicitly states that it  
> has no conformance criteria - has been duly noted.

If that's your point of view on the matter, then why does SVG Tiny  
1.2 claim to be in accordance with AWWW? Wouldn't that be a trivial  
statement, that is then true of, say, a toaster oven? I don't think  
Ian was wrong to assume that the statement he objected to was meant  
to be meaningful.

Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2006 22:40:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:08 UTC