Quoting Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>: > Since, in practice, the group planned to limit the current scope of > event description to within a document to simplify implmentation for > SVG 1.2 tiny, and since there is no barrier to implementing a future > enhanced version of XML events in SVG-capable user agents, the group > has decided to compromise the goal of taking best advantage of the > Web now in order to simplify compatibility with the existing XML > events specification, and will therefore use the existing XML events > specification as it is. We believe this is exactly what you have > requested in your comments. Yes. This would satisfy my comment. It may be worth to point out that in a related thread someone requested to remove all of XML Events given that you don't really need it for vector graphics <http://www.w3.org/mid/dq5sk1$nnv$1@sea.gmane.org> or give detailed use cases for its inclusion. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>Received on Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:08:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:33 GMT