W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2006

Re: Effect of 'animateMotion' on transform.animVal

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:16:35 +0100
To: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <2tc6s1hsk9q5caiu517idgh2r580jdhgf6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Cameron McCormack wrote:
>Perhaps if it doesn't affect the animated transform value it is because
>'animateMotion' can be applied to elements that don't implement
>SVGTransformable.  In the list of elements that can be animated with
>'animateMotion', only one of them doesn't implement SVGTransformable:
>'mask'.  But then, 'mask' doesn't implement SVGLocatable either, so I'm
>not sure what it means to animate its motion when it doesn't have a CTM.

In http://www.w3.org/mid/20051031095450.13928CFCCA@lilith.local the SVG
Working Group pointed out that having a transform attribute and beeing a
legal target for animateMotion are orthogonal properties of an element;
I guess implementing SVGTransformable is orthogonal to both aswell...
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2006 04:18:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:33 GMT