W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2006

Re: SVGT 1.2: Appendix C3: SVG Error Processing

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:40:25 -0600
Message-ID: <43BD9249.1010608@mit.edu>
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
CC: www-svg@w3.org

Jim Ley wrote:
> Just define what an error is, and leave the rest to the UA.  Vote for less 
> work!

For whom?  The spec authors?  Or the UA implementors and content authors? 
Well-specified error behavior (even something as simple as XML's "this is a 
fatal error, drop everything on the floor and stop" behavior) leads to 
significantly less work for UA implementors and (in the long run) content 
authors.  Of course it _is_ more work for the authors of the specification in 
some cases, especially if the desired error-handling is complicated.

As a simple example, the ratio of time spent on HTML parsing vs time spent on 
XML parsing in Gecko development right now is probably about 10:1.  Largely 
because with XML parsing issues simply don't arise; you just follow the spec, 
and as soon as content doesn't you bail.  No complex error-recovery behavior to 
reverse-engineer.  The XML parser is definitely a lot less work for this 
particular set of UA implementors, even though the HTML parser is older and more 

Received on Thursday, 5 January 2006 21:40:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:06 UTC