On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Doug Schepers wrote: > > | > By the way, I assume that a <script> element with non-text > | children is in > | > error, right? > | > | It can't be in error, there might be XML based script languages. > > Good catch, Jim. Does wording need to be put in the spec to cover this > eventuality? The W3C already has at least one XML-based scripting language in REC, and has recently published a WD for another XML-based scripting language, so I'd say yes. XForms Actions: http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/slice10.html REX: http://www.w3.org/TR/rex/ -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Thursday, 16 February 2006 20:45:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:33 GMT