Re: Assumption in the SVG specifications

Hi Dave,

>
>> So we ended up saying that image should not point to vector graphics 
>> because otherwise, the same content would have led to different 
>> behaviors in  a 1.1 Full and 1.2 Tiny player.
>
> so you forbid what 1.1 allowed?  I got lost here.
I forgot to mention that SVG 1.1 Tiny did put a restriction on the image 
element (http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile/#imageelement):
" SVGB and SVGT require support of the JPEG and PNG formats on the image 
element. SVGB also requires support of SVG format on the image element."

So SVG T 1.2 from that point is somewhere in between SVG 1.1 Tiny and 
SVG 1.1 Full, just like SVG 1.1 Basic.

Regards,

Cyril
>
>