W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Assumption in the SVG specifications

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:31:05 +0200
Message-Id: <A1CF1BC1-AA4C-48F8-AF8C-29C0BD65D8AF@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
To: Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>

On Aug 31, 2006, at 16:11, Dave Singer wrote:
> So, SVGB 1.1 allowed use of <image> for SVG images (one presumes un- 
> animated), but this permission is orphaned in 1.2, where this is  
> NOT permitted.

Well to be fair B is considered to be more or less a dead branch.

> What fun we have!

You can see why there was disagreement :)

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 31 August 2006 14:31:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:35 GMT