- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:25:08 +0200
- To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 1:10:42 PM, Jim wrote: JL> "Dave Singer" <singer@apple.com> wrote in message JL> news:p0623099bc11c6f386149@[17.202.35.52]... >> Could someone clarify if the intent of this specification was to exclude >> the use of all other possible static vector formats? JL> Other vector format would just be embedded through foreignObject rather than JL> through image, surely? ForeignObject can indeed be used for anything. The advantage of using the animation element for an animated vector format is that it is a timed element,so the animated vector whatever can be started, stopped, paused independently of the rest of the SVG. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 31 August 2006 11:25:18 UTC