W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2006

Re: SVGT 1.2: "evt" vs "event" as the implicit event argument to event handlers

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:18:21 +0200
Message-ID: <71381443.20060424231821@w3.org>
To: Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, <www-svg@w3c.org>

On Monday, April 24, 2006, 11:05:47 PM, Jonathan wrote:

JW> Chris Lilley wrote:
>> Of course, the actual parameters (variables or constants) that are
>> passed to calls to the function/procedure could be called anything at
>> all as long as they had the required type

JW> Well, that's what the "evt" vs. "event" issue is about - the name in the calling
JW> scope, no?

In which case, why does it need to be standardized?


-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Interaction Domain Leader
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 21:18:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT