W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2006

RE: SVGT 1.2: "evt" vs "event" as the implicit event argument to event handlers

From: Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:15:04 -0400
To: <www-svg@w3c.org>
Message-Id: <20060424191505.0C7FD609FD@filch.dreamhost.com> 

Hi-

Robin Berjon wrote:
| 
| For the sake of consensus and closing this comment, can't we agree 
| to have both (since there are arguments for either) and look into 
| deprecation when some more water has flown under the bridge?

I agree. I don't see a serious downside to having both 'evt' and 'event'
that isn't already raised by adding 'event' to SVG.

Regards-
Doug

doug.schepers@vectoreal.com
www.vectoreal.com ...for scalable solutions.
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 19:15:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT