W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2006

Re: SVGT 1.2: "evt" vs "event" as the implicit event argument to event handlers

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:05:04 +0200
Message-Id: <FC923DE6-CD3D-4C42-A280-60B42D2336AA@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg@w3c.org
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>

On Apr 24, 2006, at 20:28, Chris Lilley wrote:
> This is why adding 'event' to SVG is suggested, to help with HTML 
> +SVG CDI
> cases; but deprecating the otherwise undocumented 'event' over time  
> and
> keeping the standardized 'evt'.

For the sake of consensus and closing this comment, can't we agree to  
have both (since there are arguments for either) and look into  
deprecation when some more water has flown under the bridge?

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 19:04:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT