W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2005

Re: SVG12: standard language bindings

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:30:26 +0200
Message-ID: <86945399.20051019213026@w3.org>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org

On Monday, April 18, 2005, 12:59:21 AM, Bjoern wrote:

BH> Dear Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group,

BH>   From http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/svgudomidl.html

BH> [...]
BH>   The SVG UDOM IDL defines the model for the SVG UDOM. Note that the SVG
BH>   UDOM IDL is defined such that some interfaces have more than one base
BH>   class. The different standard language bindings for the SVG UDOM are
BH>   responsible for defining how to map all aspects of the SVG UDOM into
BH>   the given language, including how the language should implement 
BH>  interfaces with more than one base class.
BH> [...]

BH> No such "standard language bindings" exist. Please change the draft such
BH> that these "standard language bindings" are included.

Perhaps two things are being mixed up here:

a) required language bindings. SVGT 1.2 does not require a particular
language binding to be supported. SVG 1.1 does (ECMAScript)

b) standardised bindings. There might be multiple ways of expressing
the abstract IDL interface in a given language binding. This
specification defines a standard way to do that, for a couple of
languages. Implementations that follow that binding for a given language
are compliant for that language binding; implementations  that make up
their own way of mapping the given language to the IDL have used a
non-standard binding.

In that context, does the text you quoted make sense? There are no
*required* language bindings, but a couple of *standard* ones are
supplied for ECMAScript and Java.



-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2005 19:30:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:31 GMT