W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2005

Re: [SVGMobile12] focus related methods in SVGSVGElement Interface

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:18:51 -0800
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20051129191851.GC28061@ridley.dbaron.org>
On Tuesday 2005-11-29 15:56 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Quoting Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>:
> >AvK> Wouldn't it be easier to require that when elements in the document
> >AvK> appear to be in the SVG namespace SVGDocument must be implemented
> >AvK> on the same object that implements the Document interface defined
> >AvK> in DOM Level 3 Core?
> >
> >I think that would be a useful thing for WICD to require. Its not clear
> >that we can go requiring it in general.
> 
> Ok. I guess I agree. Although I'd move it up to the CDI framework :-) 
> (And make
> it general, not SVG specific.)

It's reasonable for the CDI framework to require that:
 * if an implementation supports the FooML (e.g., SVG) DOM, and
 * if it supports FooML (e.g., SVG) as a part of mixed-namespace documents,
then either:
 * (my preferred solution) all potentially-mixed-namespace documents
   support the FooML DOM's document interface (e.g., SVGDocument), or
 * all mixed-namespace documents containing FooML (e.g., SVG) elements
   support the FooML DOM's document interface.
(The document interfaces available could also be determined by the root
element or the media type (MIME type), but I don't think many people
like those options much, and they wouldn't solve this problem.)

(I think I've said this before in the CDF WG, but it's worth clarifying
again.)

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
           Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation

Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2005 13:46:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:32 GMT