Chris Lilley wrote: >>> the content of a foreignObject is treated as atomic from the point of >>> view of SVG compositing. > > BZ> I assume this is stated somewhere and I just missed it? > > Hmm, perhaps not explicitly. Is the wording above suitable (with s/is > treated/must be treated/ ?) Yes, that seems reasonable. -BorisReceived on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 17:39:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:56 GMT