On Tuesday, November 8, 2005, 5:16:28 PM, Boris wrote: BZ> Chris Lilley wrote: >> BZ> It's not clear to me how this section interacts with foreignObject. >> >> the content of a foreignObject is treated as atomic from the point of >> view of SVG compositing. BZ> I assume this is stated somewhere and I just missed it? Hmm, perhaps not explicitly. Is the wording above suitable (with s/is treated/must be treated/ ?) BZ> The rest sounds fine. Thanks! -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 16:51:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:56 GMT