On 11/2/05 4:01 AM, Nandini Ramani wrote: >> I'm mainly objecting to the wording "author's computation of the total >> path length of the path", and feel it should be changed to reflect >> that the value can be anything the author/tool desires. For example, >> for the purposes of authoring I might want to say that the path length >> is one even though the true computed length is much different. >> > The wording "author's computation" does imply that it can be anything > the author desires, but perhaps > you would like to suggest an alternate wording for the definition of > pathLength, basically a replacement for the line below: > "The author's computation of the total length of the path, in user > units" How about "The authoring length of the path, in user units"? -torReceived on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:29:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:56 GMT