W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Comments on textArea vs flowText

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:01:36 +0200
Message-ID: <5410498353.20050509140136@w3.org>
To: "Doug Schepers" <doug@schepers.cc>
Cc: "'David Woolley'" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, www-svg@w3.org

On Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 1:08:43 AM, Doug wrote:

DS> The point is not how rich or poor the semantics of SVG or HTML are,
DS> though. It is that SVG needs the means to render then as the user
DS> wishes. That's why it needs powerful, full-featured text wrapping.

DS> If it has some nod towards semantics, I don't think it will hurt
DS> anything, but the key focus should be on how well it can do its job,
DS> which is presentation.

Very well put.

-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Monday, 9 May 2005 12:02:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:30 GMT