W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2005

Re: SVG12: XML 1.0 vs XML 1.1

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:20:32 +0200
Message-ID: <42AF11E0.7010909@expway.fr>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org

Dear Björn,

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/ does not make much
> sense with respect to XML 1.0 vs XML 1.1. For conformance it is required
> that only XML 1.1 can be used to author SVG content, yet all examples in
> the draft are XML 1.0 documents and thus non-conforming.

That is not correct: all XML 1.0 instances are well-formed XML 1.1 
instances.

> Support for XML
> 1.1 is also not required from "Conforming SVG Viewers" such that it is
> essentially impossible to create conforming and interoperable content.
> 
> Some sections also refer to certain aspects of XML 1.0 rather than
> depend on the XML version of the document, for example, some things are
> defined to be XML Names without saying under which definition (there are
> four) or if an attempt is made to discuss it, XML 1.0 is referenced
> which means that XML 1.1 is of little use. Please subsantively revise
> the draft in this regard (as I've requested before...)

There were a few stray references to XML 1.0 which meant to be XML 1.1, 
they have been fixed.

Thanks,

-- 
Robin Berjon
   Senior Research Scientist
   Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 17:20:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:30 GMT