W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2005

Re: Namespace resolution under sXBL

From: Jon Ferraiolo <jonf@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:41:19 -0700
To: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>, www-svg@w3.org
Message-id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050829153923.0419cfd8@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com>

Thanks for pointing out an ambiguity!

It makes sense to me that namespace resolutions follows the DOM tree, both 
because that is consistent with the xml:base spec but also because the 
person creating the various XML files wants to control xml:base and not 
have surprises happen due to shadow trees.

Jon

At 03:22 PM 8/29/2005, Cameron McCormack wrote:

>Hi.
>
>A quick question regarding the resolution of namespaces (i.e., the
>behaviour of Node.lookupNamespaceURI and Node.lookupPrefix) when there
>are sXBL shadow trees present in the document.  Should namespace
>resolution follow the DOM tree (as section 4.5 states about xml:base
>processing) or the flattened tree?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Cameron
>
>--
>   e-mail : cam (at) mcc.id.au           icq : 26955922
>      web : http://mcc.id.au/            msn : cam-msn (at) aka.mcc.id.au
>   office : +61399055779              jabber : heycam (at) jabber.org
Received on Monday, 29 August 2005 23:10:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:31 GMT