- From: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:18:39 +1000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Chris.
I wrote:
> > Also, a lot of the red monospace text describing the
> > transformations is quite unreadable.
Chris Lilley:
> To clarify - is it the styling that makes it unreadable, or are you
> using 'red monospaced' to indicate the particular pieces of text whose
> content is unreadable?
Just to identify. I think it was mostly the lack of indentation that I
found caused the unreadability.
> The spec says:
>
> In the above definition, g[n] refers to the element with
> the id "g-n"
Ah ok I missed that line.
> We might say that more clearly as
>
> In the above definition, E[n] refers to the element called
> E with the id "g-n". So, in Example "n=2" the element
> hierarchy from the root to the rect is svg[g-2], g[g-1],
> g[g-0] and rect[elt].
>
> Would that be clearer? SVG Tiny 1.2 does not allow nested svg elements,
> so the closest ancestor *is* also the outermost one. The distinction
> will be important for SVG Full though, which does allow nested svg
> elements.
Ok. The above text seems clear to me. I think the main thing though
was that I jumped in to section 7.7.5 and missed the g[n] syntax
definition.
Cameron
--
e-mail : cam (at) mcc.id.au icq : 26955922
web : http://mcc.id.au/ msn : cam-msn (at) aka.mcc.id.au
office : +61399055779 jabber : heycam (at) jabber.org
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2005 13:18:49 UTC